A common complaint from stakeholders comes in the form of a “Monday Morning Quarterback” quip. Hindsight is always better than foresight, and it is not constructive criticism when it aims to taint the value of a project effort. However, this criticism is often warranted, and the researcher shares responsibility if they allow a myopic view of the question set.

With Revise IT services we apply our bridge or relevance methodology to identify where incomplete questions create an inability to complete the circle of understanding for conclusive certainty. Adding questions or a second part to a question often eliminates the potential for such all-too-common after-the-fact criticism.

Our “what if” method looks at questions from an end-point perspective to ensure you can complete the story! Our recommendations to add questions is not in support of scope. Instead, it assures the required depth of topic coverage as potential use opportunities have the proper context and definition. Watch as we create lightbulb moments where you might say, “That’s a keeper,” with a sense of confident satisfaction.